FLAWS OF PRO-ISRAEL RAPTURISM

By Dave Haigler, Dave@Haigler.info - November 2004

 

Because of the perceived influence of dispensational rapturism upon U.S. foreign policy towards Israel, there is an increased interest in this theory and its views of the end-times.  This subject is particularly timely in the historical context of two developments:  (a) Tim LaHaye’s rapturistic Left Behind series of books that are selling tens of millions of copies (Tyndale House Publishers, Wheaton, Illinois); and (b) Jerry Falwell’s claiming a rapturistic pro-Israel influence of millions upon the Bush Administration anytime it does anything not perceived as 100% knee-jerk supportive of Israel.

 

We will discuss four aspects of dispensational rapturism: 

 

            (1) Its definition and history;

            (2) Its treatment of God's law and grace, contrasted with prior post-Reformation Christianity;

            (3) Its beliefs concerning the relationship of the Christian church to Israel; and

            (4) Its distinctive view of the end-times, sometimes called the "preTribulational rapture."

 

In researching this piece, I started out with the hope that I could explain a few Bible verses and contrast them with dispensationalism, rather than indulge in excessive theological quibbling, for there is a lot of that in the bibliography, and a good example is found in "CALVINISM EX CATHEDRA: A REVIEW OF JOHN H. GERSTNER'S WRONGLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF TRUTH: A CRITIQUE OF DISPENSATIONALISM  by ZANE C. HODGES, at website:  http://www.faithalone.org/journal/1991b/Calvin.html

 

 

I. Dispensationalism - Its Nature & Origins

 

The first challenge is defining what dispensationalism stands for (including the belief in a rapture, the theory that Christians will be raptured or taken out of the earth, leaving all their troubles and all unbelievers behind).  It would seem easy enough to research whomever is the leading spokesperson for the view and summarize his/her explanation.  However, there is an ominous warning in the published dispensational literature that says there are three distinct phases of dispensationalism from 1909 through the end of that century, and any skeptic should beware of criticizing something that has been revised:

 

 

]           If you are a skeptic, detractor, or critic of dispensationalism, you might want to find out and make clear just what you are critiquing: Is it one of the dispensational expressions from the centuries before Darby, Scofield and Chafer? Is it the systematized Darby, Scofield, Chafer Classical versions from before the 1950s? Is it the Revised school of thought from before the 1990s? Or is it the presently rising Progressive Dispensationalism? If all your training and opposition is geared to something from the 1800s, or even the first half of the 1900s it may come as an embarrassing shock for you to find out in the 2000s that what you are trained to oppose isn’t what a huge percent of today’s (and tomorrow’s) dispensationalists even believe.

 

(emphasis mine, to note the 3 phases and the erroneous implication that dispensationalism had origins prior to 1800).  Rev. Robert Gillette, "WELCOME TO THE PROGRESSIVE DISPENSATIONALISM PAGE!" -- http://members.tripod.com/~RobertGillette/LSBBB_2.htm (accessed Nov. 1, 2002).  

 

 

To keep this article manageable, we will focus on Gillette's middle position, as articulated in the leading treatise on the subject, Charles Ryrie, Dispensationalism Today (Chicago: Moody Press, 1965), republished as Dispensationalism (Chicago:  Moody Press, 1995).

 

 

Dispensationalism is a subset of premillennialism originating among the Plymouth Brethren in the early 1830's, with traces of it in the prior decade found in the writings of three charismatic women missionaries living in the British Isles. The founder of dispensationalism, John Nelson Darby, who had legal training and was an ordained Anglican priest, was one of the early leaders of the Plymouth Brethren movement, which arose in opposition to what many felt was the empty ritualism of the Church of England. For the Brethren, the true "invisible" church should depart from what they considered an unfaithful "visible" Church, rejecting such things as priests and sacraments.  Darby was the leader who brought dispensationalism to the U.S. through some successful crusades facilitated by the leading U.S. evangelist of the time, Dwight L. Moody, although Moody resisted being labeled as a dispensationalist.  Dispensational theology focuses upon the idea of God's dealings with humankind being divided (in essence) into seven distinct periods or "dispensations", in which mankind is tested as to its obedience to God as revealed under each of those dispensations.  Charles Ryrie, Dispensationalism Today (Chicago: Moody Press, 1965), 41-45, 65-67.

 

 

 

II. Different Treatments of Law & Grace

 

One of the key subjects on which dispensationalism has evolved through its various phases is its treatment of law vs. grace.  At first, different plans of salvation were found in the earlier edition of the Scofield Reference Bible (New York: Oxford University Press, 1909, 1927), page 1115, note 1(2), footnoted to John 1:17, where Scofield contrasted the dispensation of law with that of grace. "The point of testing is no longer legal obedience as the condition of salvation, but acceptance or rejection of Christ..." (emphasis added.)   This statement unambiguously says that Israel under the law was saved by one "condition" while Christians under grace are saved by another "condition." Scofield's words, "no longer," indicate that there was a time when legal obedience was the means of salvation.  That distinction does not appear in the 1967 revision, the New Scofield Reference Bible (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967).  Instead, in the current edition in its footnote 1(2) to John 1:17, it says, “Under the former dispensation, law was shown to be powerless to secure righteousness and life for a sinful race,” citing Gal. 3:21-22, Ibid., p. 1124; and in its footnote to Gal. 3:24, the editors explain "the Christian doctrine of the law," as distinguished from the Mosaic covenant given to Israel:  "Law is in contrast with grace.  Under the latter God bestows the righteousness which, under law, He demanded."  Ibid., page 1268, citing Exodus 19:5, among other passages.  Exodus 19:5 says, "Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people; for all the earth is mine."  The 1967 Scofield footnotes to this verse say that the "if" made that covenant conditional to Israel, but for Christians the covenant "is, under grace, freely given to every believer."  And, "The Christian is not under the conditional Mosaic Covenant of works, the law, but under the unconditional New Covenant of grace."  Ibid., page 95.  Apparently in response to criticism of the earlier edition setting forth "legal obedience as the condition of salvation," the 1967 edition says in several places that obedience to the law is not the means of salvation; e.g., the footnote to Exodus 19:3, which says, "the law is not here proposed as a means of salvation...."  Ibid., page 94.  Another example is found in the "Introduction to the 1967 Edition," which says that "throughout all the Scriptures there is only one basis of salvation, i.e. by grace through faith."  Ibid., page vii.  This Introduction also says that the changes from the 1909 edition include "clarification of some footnotes, deletion of others, and the addition of many new notes," Ibid., page v, but does not admit that such changes masked Scofield's concept of different means of salvation.  This Introduction, however, does state that "it is generally recognized that the distinction between law and grace is basic to the understanding of the Scriptures."  Ibid., page vii. 

 

In contrast with Scofield's earlier view that between the fall of man and the sacrifice of Christ, "legal obedience [was] the condition of salvation," which the 1967 edition masked, the core of post-Reformation Christianity for over 350 years has believed that the covenant of works as a means of securing eternal life, upon condition of perfect and personal obedience to God, applied only prior to the fall of Adam, but was superceded by the covenant of grace thereafter, but long before Jesus Christ was incarnated.  This standard of orthodox belief is seen in Chapter 7 of the Westminster Confession of Faith of 1641-46 and the Scriptures supporting it, as follows: 

 

] 7:2 The first covenant made with man was a covenant of works Gal_3:12), wherein life was promised to Adam, and in him to his posterity (Rom_5:12-20; Rom_10:5), upon condition of perfect and personal obedience (Gen_2:17; Gal_3:10).

 

] 7:3 Man, by his fall having made himself incapable of life by that covenant, the Lord was pleased to make a second (Gen_3:15; Isa_42:6; Rom_3:20, Rom_3:21; Rom_8:3; Gal_3:21), commonly called the covenant of grace; wherein He freely offereth unto sinners life and salvation by Jesus Christ, requiring of them faith in Him that they may be saved (Mar_16:15, Mar_16:16; Joh_3:16; Rom_10:6, Rom_10:9; Gal_3:11), and promising to give unto all those that are ordained unto life His Holy Spirit, to make them willing and able to believe (Eze_36:26, Eze_36:27; Joh_6:44, Joh_6:45).

 

 

Does this evidence of "different plans of salvation [as] found in the earlier edition of the Scofield Reference Bible" show up in other dispensational writings?  Yes it does. 

 

 

Lewis Sperry Chafer, the founder of Dallas Theological Seminary, and thus a leading dispensationalist, also teaches two different plans of salvation, in his assertion of a complete separation of the New Testament dispensation from that of other dispensations.  In Dispensationalism (Dallas: Seminary Press, 1936), p. 416,  he says:

 

] The essential elements of a grace administration -- faith as the sole basis of acceptance with God, unmerited acceptance through a perfect standing in Christ, the present possession of eternal life, an absolute security from all condemnation, and the enabling power of the indwelling Spirit -- are not found in the kingdom administration. On the other hand, it is declared to be the fulfilling of the law and the prophets (Matt. 5:17,18; 7:12), and is seen to be an extension of the Mosaic Law into realms of meritorious obligation.

 

 

This statement alludes to the dispensational "parenthesis theory," under which the church age is sandwiched between the dispensation of law (old testament) and the dispensation of the kingdom (after the rapture of the church), and in which the dispensations of law and kingdom use the same standard, "the fulfilling of the law and the prophets," for achieving salvation. 

 

 

A third dispensationalist, William Evans (Outline Studies of the Bible, p. 34), also states more than one plan of salvation based upon a distinct separation of the church age from other dispensations:

 

] This is sometimes called the Age of the Church, or the Church period. The characteristic of this age is that salvation is no longer by legal obedience, but by the personal acceptance of the finished work of Jesus Christ, who by his meritorious ministry has procured for us a righteousness of God.

 

 

Thus Evans clearly argues that, during this present Church age, salvation is through personal acceptance of the meritorious ministry of Christ, while in the age prior to this one, the people of Israel were saved by legal obedience.

 

 

The "different plans of salvation" taught by dispensationists have been recognized by non-dispensationalists as in contrast with the traditional Christian gospel, as the core of post-Reformation believers have viewed it (in keeping with chapters 7.2 and 7.3 of the Confession of Faith quoted above).  An example of this contrast is seen in a report of the 1944 General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United States:

 

] Dispensationalism rejects the doctrine that God has, since the Fall, but one plan of salvation for all mankind and affirms that God has been through the ages administering various and diverse plans of salvation for various groups...

 

 

This dispensational distinction, between "plans of salvation" in the old testament vs. the new testament, would also seem at odds with Romans 4, (ALL-CAPS QUOTING THE OLD TESTAMENT) where the Apostle Paul speaks of our father in the faith, Abraham, saying:

 

Rom 4:1  What then shall we say that Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh, has found?

Rom 4:2  For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God.

Rom 4:3  For what does the Scripture say? "ABRAHAM BELIEVED GOD, AND IT WAS CREDITED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS."

Rom 4:4  Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due.

Rom 4:5  But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness,

Rom 4:6  just as David also speaks of the blessing on the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works:

Rom 4:7  "BLESSED ARE THOSE WHOSE LAWLESS DEEDS HAVE BEEN FORGIVEN, AND WHOSE SINS HAVE BEEN COVERED.

Rom 4:8  "BLESSED IS THE MAN WHOSE SIN THE LORD WILL NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT."

Rom 4:9  Is this blessing then on the circumcised, or on the uncircumcised also? For we say, "FAITH WAS CREDITED TO ABRAHAM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS."

Rom 4:10  How then was it credited? While he was circumcised, or uncircumcised? Not while circumcised, but while uncircumcised;

Rom 4:11  and he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had while uncircumcised, so that he might be the father of all who believe without being circumcised, that righteousness might be credited to them,

Rom 4:12  and the father of circumcision to those who not only are of the circumcision, but who also follow in the steps of the faith of our father Abraham which he had while uncircumcised.

Rom 4:13  For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith.

 

 

III. Continuity of Israel & The Church Contrasted

 

Dispensationalists believe God is pursuing two distinct purposes throughout history, one focusing on an earthly goal and people (Jews), the other on heavenly goals and people (the church).  Charles Ryrie, Dispensationalism Today (Chicago: Moody Press, 1965), 45, citing Chafer, op. cit., p. 107.

 

 

It thus appears that a core doctrine of dispensationalism is the separation between Israel and the Christian church. Dispensationalism sees Israel as an earthly people with earthly promises, and the church as a heavenly people with heavenly promises. Membership in Israel is by natural birth.  Ryrie, Dispensationalism Today, pp.137-140.  Whereas, everyone enters the church by supernatural birth. John. 1:12-13; 3:7. 

 

 

Darby, the founder of dispensationalism, states this separation very starkly: "The Jewish nation is never to enter the church."  J.N. Darby, The Hopes of the Church of God (London: G. Morrish, n.d.), p.106.  Despite Gillette's view quoted in Section I above that Darby and Ryrie are of two different generations in interpreting dispensationalism, Ryrie confirms Darby's view of this clear separation, claiming this view as the most important dispensational doctrine, with the statement that the "basic premise of Dispensationalism is two purposes of God expressed in the formation of two peoples who maintain their distinction throughout eternity."  Ryrie, Dispensationalism Today, pp.44-45, citing Daniel P. Fuller, “The Hermeneutics of Dispensationalism” (Doctor’s dissertation, Chicago:  Northern Baptist Theological Seminary, 1957), p. 25, and citing Chafer, op. cit., p. 107.  These views of Dr. Ryrie are confirmed in his later edition, Dispensationalism (Chicago: Moody Press, 1995), p. 39ff. 

 

 

In contrast, the core of post-Reformation Christianity has believed that the church was "grafted into" the family tree of Israel (the children of Abraham), by faith in Jesus Christ, and has believed that Jews will be grafted back into the family tree later, without any such dispensational distinction between the two.  As Romans 11:7-8 says:  What then? What Israel is seeking, it has not obtained, but those who were chosen obtained it, and the rest were hardened; just as it is written, "GOD GAVE THEM A SPIRIT OF STUPOR, EYES TO SEE NOT AND EARS TO HEAR NOT, DOWN TO THIS VERY DAY."  And continuing in v. 11, "But by their transgression salvation has come to the Gentiles, to make them jealous.   And again in v. 15, "For if their [Jews'] rejection [of the gospel] is [leads to] the reconciliation of the [gentile] world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead?"  And continuing in v. 17, "But if some of the [Jewish] branches were broken off, and you [gentiles], being a wild olive, were grafted in among them and became partaker with them of the rich root of the olive tree, [v. 18] do not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, remember that it is not you who supports the root, but the root supports you."  And finally, v. 23:  And they [the Jews] also, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted [back] in, for God is able to graft them in again."  NAS. 

 

 

It is very important to decide whether, in Scriptures such as those, this continuity exists between Israel and the church, just as prior post-Reformation Christianity believed, because dispensationalists admit that if the church can be shown to be fulfilling promises made to Israel, their system is doomed. "If the church is fulfilling Israel's promises as contained in the new covenant or anywhere in the Scriptures, then [dispensational] premillennialism is condemned.”  Ryrie, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE NEW COVENANT TO PREMILLENNIALISM (unpublished Master's thesis, Dallas Theological Seminary 1947), p. 31. 

 

 

Well, are there any promises in the Bible to Israel that were fulfilled by the church?  Yes; here are a few examples:

 

 

1.  Promise to be called "sons of the Living God:"

 

            ] a. Promised to Israel - "Yet the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, Which cannot be measured or numbered. And it shall come to pass in the place where it was said to them, 'You are not My people,' There it shall be said to them, 'You are sons of the living God.'" -Hosea 1:10.

 

            ] b. Fulfilled in the church - What if God, wanting to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, and that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, which He had prepared beforehand for glory, even us whom He called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles? As He says also in Hosea: "I will call them My people, who were not My people, And her beloved, who was not beloved." "And it shall come to pass in the place where it was said to them, 'You are not My people,' There they shall be called sons of the living God." -Romans 9:22-26.

 

 

 

 

 

2. Promise to rebuild the tabernacle of David:

 

            ] a. Promised to Israel - "On that day I will raise up The tabernacle of David, which has fallen down, And repair its damages; I will raise up its ruins, And rebuild it as in the days of old;" -Amos 9:11.

 

            ] b. Fulfilled in the church - "Simon has declared how God at the first visited the Gentiles to take out of them a people for His name.  And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written: 'After this I will return And will rebuild the tabernacle of David, which has fallen down; I will rebuild its ruins, And I will set it up; So that the rest of mankind may seek the LORD, Even all the Gentiles who are called by My name, Says the LORD who does all these things.' Known to God from eternity are all His works." -Acts 15:14-18.

 

 

3. Becoming the people of God:

 

            ] a. Promised to Israel - "Then I will sow her for Myself in the earth, And I will have mercy on her who had not obtained mercy; Then I will say to those who were not My people, 'You are My people!' And they shall say, 'You are my God!'" -Hosea 2:23.

 

            ] b. Fulfilled in the church - "But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, His own special people, that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light; who once were not a people but are now the people of God, who had not obtained mercy but now have obtained mercy." -1 Peter 2:9-10.

 

 

Besides these promises made to Israel that were fulfilled in the church, there are other old testament references to Israel that are applied directly to the new testament church:

 

1. The promise of God in Amos 2:28-32, "I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh; Your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, Your young men shall see visions, Your old men shall dream dreams.  This was fulfilled in the church at Pentecost as shown in Acts 2:1,16-21.

 

 

2. The promise of God to his people that they would be a priesthood and a holy nation, given to Israel in Exodus 19:6, and applied to the church  in 1 Peter 2:9. 

 

 

3. God's placing his tabernacle or temple among his people, promised to Israel in Ezekiel 37:27, and applied to the church in 2 Cor 6:16.

 

 

4. The promise of the "new covenant," given to Israel in Jer 31:31, and applied to the church Luke 22:20.  This would seem crystal clear; but not to Dr. Ryrie, a leading dispensationalist, who writes that, if the church is fulfilling the promise given to Israel under the New Covenant, dispensationalism is dead. Ryrie, in his own words, makes this critical admission:

 

] If the church does not have a new covenant, then she is fulfilling Israel's promises, for it has been clearly shown that the Old Testament teaching on the new covenant is that it is for Israel. If the church is fulfilling Israel's promises as contained in the new covenant or anywhere else in the Scriptures, then [dispensational] premillennialism is condemned. [Ryrie's Master's thesis, Ibid., p. 31].

 

 

Research has shown little dispensational treatment of Romans 9, especially verses 6-8.  In contrast with the dispensationalist view that "Israel" refers to a physical lineage of Jews as children of Abraham, it is hard to imagine a passage that so clearly says the opposite:  The Apostle Paul, in speaking of his grief and anguish over the fact that many of his fellow Jews had not believed in Jesus Christ, said, in Rom 9:6,  "But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel; Rom 9:7  nor are they all children because they are Abraham's descendants, but: "THROUGH ISAAC YOUR DESCENDANTS WILL BE NAMED."  Rom 9:8  That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants."  Thus the true Israel here is believers in Christ.  Dr. Ryrie, however, tries to explain away this plain meaning by saying this passage “simply distinguishes the nation as a whole from the believing element within the nation.”  Dispensationalism Today, op. cit., p. 138 (emphasis in original).

 

 

IV. Support of Israel & the Rapture Theory

 

Despite the dispensational view explained in the prior section that the Christian church and Israel are entirely distinct and separate people, dispensationalism teaches that the church is under a duty to support Israel in every way possible.  This is seen in Chafer’s statement that gentile believers are under a perpetual duty to “minister to Israel.”  Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology, vol. IV, “Eschatology”  (Dallas: Seminary Press, 1948), p. 416.  Chafer cites only Rev. 21:24-26 & Matt. 25:41-46 for this proposition.  A review of those verses shows no mention of ministering to or supporting Israel.  Nor does Chafer’s index have any references to supporting or ministering to Israel.  Ibid., (vol viii), p. 133. 

 

 

The word "Israel" appears 71 times in the new testament of the New American Standard Bible.  Some of those verses refer to the old testament nation of Israel or otherwise refer to it as Jews from a physical lineage, and some refer to it as people of faith as seen in Romans 9 quoted above.  None of these 71 references contains a command to support Israel, meaning either believers or physical descendents of Jews. 

 

 

Could it be that the concept of Israel, or Jews who don't believe in Jesus, continuing as the children of God, is expressed in words other than supporting or helping Israel?  What about the expression "children of God?"  Well, it appears in a least 18 verses in the NASB new testament, and none of those refer to unbelieving Jews, but rather to believers in Jesus.  What about "people of God?"  There are 24 verses in the NASB new testament with that combination of words;  no more than 3-4 of those refer to Jews or Israel, and those involve people of faith in historical, old testament Israel; whereas more than that number refer to believers in Christ who are not Jewish.  What about “inherit the land?”  This concept is frequently heard in dispensational circles where it is argued that the 1948 re-creation of the nation of Israel by U.N.  mandate was a re-fulfilment or re-enactment of God’s old testament gift of the “promised land” to Israel in that region of the world.  But that expression, “inherit the land,” is not found in the NASB new testament.  Nor is the expression “promised land,” nor “bless Israel,” nor “pray for Israel or Jerusalem.”

 

 

The inability to find supporting new testament verses for the alleged duty to support Israel forces one to ask an unthinkable question – could any such verses exist in the old testament?  Why unthinkable?  Well, the central teaching of dispensationalism – the one from which it draws its name – is that there are 7 dispensations and that Bible passages applicable to one dispensation need not apply to other dispensations.  Thus, mathematically speaking, as little as 1/7th of the Bible could be applicable to each dispensation.  Thus it would be unthinkable in dispensationalism for any old testament passage to be binding in the church age (the age of grace).  Asking the unthinkable, however, does shed some light on possible motivation for supporting Israel, as follows. 

 

 

The word "Israel" appears 2509 times in the old testament NASB.  Only one of those verses, I Chron. 11:10, also contains the word "support," but it has nothing to do with anyone supporting Israel.  There are only 12 verses in the old testament containing both the words "Israel" and "help."  Only two of those contain any kind of encouragement for anyone to help Israel.  One of those, Deut. 33:29, says, "So your enemies will cringe before you, And you will tread upon their high places."   And one, Psa 115:9 says, "O Israel, trust in the LORD; He is their help and their shield."  This latter verse could be viewed as saying, since God supports Israel, everyone else should do so as well; however, it begs the question of which Israel is spoken of.  That is, which Israel becomes the beneficiaries of this promise in Psalm 115 -- the physical descendents or those having faith in God?

 

 

What about a Biblical incentive to “bless Israel?”  Although there are several old testament verses that contain these two words, the closest one to setting a precedent for this is this promise from God to Abram, before his name was changed to Abraham,  Gen 12:3,  “And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed."   However, if this verse were construed as a universal ethical principle, it would not sanction knee-jerk support for Israel, because the last clause, “And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed," would certainly have to include believing Christian Palestinians.  Three chapters later, there is a similar promise in Gen 15:18:  “On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, "To your descendants I have given this land, From the river of Egypt as far as the great river, the river Euphrates.”  But, again, as with Psalm 115, the verse begs the question of which descendants are spoken of; it obviously did not include Ishmael, so that implies that it is the children of promise (or faith) who are in view here, including gentile believers.  In the context of the scope of the “land,” it should be noted that a panoramic Bible view of the promised land expands with the broadening of God’s outreach to the gentiles; e.g., when the 5th Commandment was originally given, it said:  Exo.  20:12  "Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be prolonged in the land which the LORD your God gives you.” (emphasis added.)  But when repeated in the new testament, “land” becomes the whole “earth,” as follows:  

 

Eph 6:1  Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right.

Eph 6:2  HONOR YOUR FATHER AND MOTHER (which is the first commandment with a promise),

Eph 6:3  SO THAT IT MAY BE WELL WITH YOU, AND THAT YOU MAY LIVE LONG ON THE EARTH.

 

On that same covenant-expansion point, Gen 17:5  says:  "No longer shall your name be called Abram, But your name shall be Abraham; For I have made you the father of a multitude of nations.”  Note: not the father of the one nation Israel, but of many nations. 

 

 

There are 13 old testament verses containing the words “bless Israel,” and most of them deal with Israel blessing God, or vice versa, or God blessing individual faithful Israelites.  The closest one to any kind of universal principle is Deu. 26:15-19, in which the old testament cleansing/sacrificial laws are invoked, a prayer is given that God will bless his people Israel and give them the promised land, and it ends with: Deu 26:18  "The LORD has today declared you to be His people, a treasured possession, as He promised you, and that you should keep all His commandments; Deu 26:19  and that He will set you high above all nations which He has made, for praise, fame, and honor; and that you shall be a consecrated people to the LORD your God, as He has spoken."  That passage, if read rigidly as limited to the Israelite nation, obviously, presupposed Israel keeping all God’s commandments, which it did not do.   On the other hand, if read expansively as applicable to all God’s believing people, it can be seen as placing them over all nations in the sense that the Great Commission of Mat. 28  speaks of discipleship and  empowerment to obey all God’s commandments: 

 

Mat 28:19  "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, …

Mat 28:20  teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age."

 

This is consistent with the Joshua 1:8 principle that God’s word is the roadmap for success:

 

Jos 1:8  "This book of the law shall not depart from your mouth, but you shall meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do according to all that is written in it; for then you will make your way prosperous, and then you will have success.

 

 

What about the idea of “peace” for “Israel” or “Jerusalem?”  There are 6 old testament verses containing containing “peace Jerusalem,” but only one comes close:  Psa 122:6  “Pray for the peace of Jerusalem:  May they prosper who love you.”  This, likewise, is a double-edged sword, because such a “peace” does not presume taking sides in the Israel/Palestinian differences – whatever that passage may have meant originally.  After all, there are both Israelis and Palestinians living in the Old City.   In like manner, there are 31 old testament verses containing the words "peace Israel."  A dozen or so deal with peace/war with neighboring peoples, 2-3 with expressions like "go in peace," and the balance dealing   with "peace offerings."  None can be stretched to say there is a universal ethical principle for every nation or people to maintain “peace with Israel.” 

 

 

Support for Israel is nevertheless somehow tied to the dispensationalist "rapture" theory.  Perhaps the connection is that, in this view, simplified, once all Christians are "raptured" out of the earth, God's attention returns again to the nation of Israel.  Dispensationalists are pessimistic about the end times, or put another way, their end-times view sees things getting worse and worse until the "rapture;" thus they are interested in seeing this "rapture" happen as soon as possible, so that they can be removed from this downhill fall of civilization.  The sooner the "rapture," the sooner God focuses again on Israel; so the two are thus connected. 

 

 

The comparatively recent millennial view of the pretribulational rapture is a core teaching of dispensationalism. The evacuation of the church to heaven prior to the tribulation period, in the rapture view, causes the previously-stopped prophetic clock to begin ticking for Israel again with what is prophetically called the "Seventieth Week of Daniel", a meaning drawn from Daniel 9:24:  "Seventy weeks have been decreed for your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to make an end of sin, to make atonement for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the most holy place."  The idea that this referred to the great tribulation was Darby's innovation.

 

] Darby broke not only from previous millenarian teaching but from all of church history by asserting that Christ's second coming would occur in two stages. The first, an invisible "secret rapture" of true believers could happen at any moment, ending the great "parenthesis" or church age which began when the Jews rejected Christ.

 

W.A. Hoffecker, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, "Darby, John Nelson," pp. 292-3.

 

Scofield also defended this rapture view along with Chafer, Ryrie, Walvoord, etc. At least through around 1990, the dispensational seminaries, and especially Dallas Theological Seminary, insisted that their students and professors hold steadfastly to the doctrine of the pretribulational rapture or face the consequences.

 

]...the doctrine of a pretribulational rapture of the church seems to be a litmus test of orthodoxy. To "outsiders," including classic premillennialists, this doctrine is not crucial, if it is believed at all. But not only is it vigorously maintained in Dallas Dispensationalism, but deviation from it causes a person to be suspect and institutions to shake and sometimes split.

 

John H. Gerstner, Wrongly Dividing the Word of Truth: A Critique of Dispensationalism (Brentwood, TN: Wolgemuth & Hyatt, 1991), 47.

 

But the question remains whether a pretribulational rapture conflicts with the Bible.  This distinctively dispensational rapture doctrine is another issue on which dispensational theology stands or falls. Thus a comparison between pretribulational rapture's teachings and the Bible is in order. 

 

Many arguments against a pretribulation rapture have focused upon showing that the doctrine is a new development in theology and cannot be found in the scriptures. Various sound non-dispensational commentators and theologians, from the ranks of each of the other millennial views, have presented this argument with clear persuasiveness.  Alexander Reese (premill.), O.T. Allis (amill.), W.E. Cox (amill.), Greg Bahnsen & Kenneth Gentry (postmill.) are examples, among others.

 

What is the rapture position then?  Many earlier dispensational scholars believed that the Old Testament saints would be resurrected along with the church in the pretribulational rapture. Alexander Reese, a classic (nondispensational) premillennialist, deftly contradicted this position with strong scriptural arguments timing the resurrection of the Old Testament saints at the Day of the Lord at the end of the Tribulation.  Alexander Reese, The Approaching Advent of Christ (Marshall, Morgan and Scott, London, 1937; reprint, Grand Rapids MI: Grand Rapids International Publications, 1975), 328 p., citing Daniel 12:1-2 and Daniel 12:8-13.  Dispensationalists would not argue that the "time of trouble such as never was since there was a nation", the "abomination of desolation", and the taking away of the daily sacrifice are not references to the great tribulation. Yet, Daniel is told that the general resurrection (including old testament believers) follows these events.

 

In response to such criticism, many dispensationalists then amended their position to separate the general resurrection from the rapture.  E.g.:

 

] ... many careful students of premillennial truth have come to the conclusion that the opinion that Israel's resurrection occurred at the time of the rapture was a hasty one and without proper Scriptural foundation. It seems far more preferable to regard the resurrection of Daniel 12:2 as a literal one following the tribulation, but not to be identified with the pretribulational rapture of the church... The church will be raised at the time of the rapture before the tribulation, and the Old Testament saints, including Israel, at the beginning of the millennial reign of Christ.

 

John F. Walvoord, Israel in Prophesy (1962; reprint, Grand Rapids MI: Zondervan, 1977), 116, 118.  See also Walvoord, Prophecy Knowledge Handbook (Wheaton, Ill.:  1990), pp. 462-464, in which Dr. Walvoord has a chart listing the 7 major resurrections including “O.T. saints,” and a section entitled “The Order of the Resurrections,” which nevertheless does not specify the order or sequence of those resurrections. 

 

 

This change delaying believing Israel’s resurrection, however, conflicted with other Biblical principles.  E.g., the teaching that the dead in faith will rise first, but contemporaneously with the living believers.  1 Cor 15:50-55; 1 Thes 4:15-17.

 

That is, we see that the faithful dead are raised first, and then those believers who are alive and remain are immediately thereafter translated into incorruptable bodies and gathered unto Christ. What is the dispensationalist rationale for the idea of the Old Testament believers being raised at some later point in time?   Here is one example:

 

] Some people are startled by the thought that the Old Testament saints will not be resurrected until the end of the Tribulation. But keep in mind that the rapture is a promise to the Church, and the Church only.

 

David R. Reagan, The Master Plan: Making Sense of the Controversies Surrounding Bible Prophecy Today (Eugene OR: Harvest House, 1993), 123.

 

Thus, the root of this argument is the dispensational distinction between Israel and the church discussed in the prior section. That is, the Old Testament believers are not "in Christ" and therefore will not arise to everlasting life at the same time as the church saints.  As Gerstner explains it:

 

] According to dispensationalists, the Old Testament people are not the heirs of the Holy Spirit, are not regenerated by Him, and are not grafted by Him into Christ in the same way that the New Testament people are.

 

John H. Gerstner, Wrongly Dividing the Word of Truth: A Critique of Dispensationalism (Brentwood TN:Wolgemuth & Hyatt, 1991), 206. The problem is further explained away by the dispensational argument that scriptures like 1 Cor 15:50-55; 1 Thes 4:15-17, cited above mean -

 

]... that the dead in Christ will precede the living in Christ in the rapture. If you are saying that Daniel would be included in "the dead", then you have to show that Daniel is "in Christ". If you will study the NT you will see that "in Christ" refers to the baptism in the Holy Spirit. "For we were all baptized by one Spirit into one body--whether Jews or Greeks, slave or free--and we were all given the one Spirit to drink...."  There is no way that Daniel was part of the body of Christ. This verse in 1 Thess 4:16 simply does not apply to him. The Holy Spirit did not permanently indwell believers in the OT. It is not really [the] people or time period that delineates the church--it is the Holy Spirit. Personal faith in Jesus Christ--which is what the passage is referring to--was not an option for OT saints. They are not in view in this passage. It is referring to people who do have the option of this personal faith in Jesus....  OT saints are "in Christ" in that sense that the death of Jesus is the basis for the salvation of anyone--past, present, future. However, they were not part of the body of Christ, in the sense of being permanently indwelt by the Holy Spirit.

 

"Resurrection Apart from Christ?" Bill Barton, Armageddon, FamilyNet, 10/21/93 (emphasis added).  This dispensational distinction is explained a third way as follows:

 

] The technical term for the Church is those who are "in Christ." 1 Thess. speaks of those who have died "in Christ" being resurrected at the time of His coming IN THE AIR. The context has ONLY the Church in mind. 

 

"Rapture," Gary Nystrom, Armageddon, FamilyNet, 5/28/94.  One can only scratch one's head at the notion that pre-resurrection believers are somehow "in Christ" but not part of the "body of Christ," so as to justify the teaching that they will be resurrected after believers who were indwelt with the Holy Spirit at & since pentecost.  This is obviously a less-than hair-thin distinction.

 

This rapture distinction would clearly seem to be at odds with Hebrews 11, where the writer refers to the faithful old testament patriarchs and says of them:  "And all these, having obtained a good testimony through faith, did not receive the promise, God having provided something better for us, that they should not be made perfect apart from us." Hebrews 11:39-40.  Yet the dispensational rapture theory says the old testament faithful will be made perfect apart from us, in an entirely different resurrection, which will occur 7 years later.

 

Thus we see that the rapture theory is not consistent with either the Bible or earlier post-Reformation beliefs.  But this theory is nevertheless the foundation of the dispensational drive to be friends of Israel, no matter what happens. 

 

Dispensationalists being allegedly friends of Israel is ironic, indeed, in view of the fact that dispensational theology completely separates Israel from the church in terms of how its people are saved (reconciled to God) and how and when they will be resurrected.  It is also ironic in view of the claim that, in the rapture theory, the Christians are not going to be around any longer when things that are considered terrible to Jews will allegedly be happening -- things like the great tribulation and mass conversions to Christianity among the Jews.  One can only wonder how these conversions will occur, since the Bible says in Rom 10:14, "How then will they call on Him in whom they have not believed? How will they believe in Him whom they have not heard? And how will they hear without a preacher?"  Once all the Christians are raptured out, in the dispensational view, who will be around to be the essential preachers?  

 

 

Rather, it seems clear that Israel and the Jews are mere cannon fodder for an end-times theory that is a cultural and political cop-out.  This end-times theory should not have any influence upon U.S. foreign policy on Israel. 

 

 

=======

 

Partial Bibliograpy:

 

Allis, Oswald T., Prophecy and the Church (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co., 1945)

 

Bahnsen, Greg L., and Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., House Divided, The Break-Up of Dispensational Theology (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1989)

 

Chafer, Lewis Sperry, Dispensationalism

 

Darby, J.N., The Hopes of the Church of God (London: G. Morrish, n.d.)

 

Gerstner, John, Wrongly Dividing the Word of Truth: A Critique of Dispensationalism (Brentwood: Wolgemuth & Hyatt, 1991)

 

Gillette, Rev. Robert , "WELCOME TO THE PROGRESSIVE DISPENSATIONALISM PAGE!" -- http://members.tripod.com/~RobertGillette/LSBBB_2.htm (accessed Nov. 1, 2002).  

 

 

HODGES, ZANE C., "CALVINISM EX CATHEDRA: A REVIEW OF JOHN H. GERSTNER'S WRONGLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF TRUTH: A CRITIQUE OF DISPENSATIONALISM , at website:  http://www.faithalone.org/journal/1991b/Calvin.html  (accessed Nov. 1, 2002)

 

 

Hoffecker, W.A., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, "Darby, John Nelson"

 

Mathison, Keith A., Dispensationalism: Rightly Dividing the People of God? (Philipsburg: R&R, 1995)

 

New Scofield Reference Bible (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967)

 

 

North, Gary, Rapture Fever - Why Dispensationalism is Paralyzed (Ft. Worth: Dominion Press, 1993)

 

Nystrom, Gary, "Rapture," Armageddon, FamilyNet, 5/28/94

 

Poythress, Vern S., Understanding Dispensationalists

 

Presbyterian Church in the United States, General Assembly, 1944

 

Reagan, David R., The Master Plan: Making Sense of the Controversies Surrounding Bible Prophecy Today (Eugene OR: Harvest House, 1993)

 

Alexander Reese, The Approaching Advent of Christ (Marshall, Morgan and Scott, London, 1937; reprint, Grand Rapids MI: Grand Rapids International Publications, 1975)

 

Ryrie, Charles, Dispensationalism Today (Chicago: Moody Press, 1965)

 

Ryrie, Charles, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE NEW COVENANT TO PREMILLENNIALISM (unpublished Master's thesis, Dallas Theological Seminary 1947)

 

Scofield, Cyrus Ingerson, ed., New Scofield Reference Bible (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967)

 

Westminster Confession of Faith & Catechisms (London, 1648)